Games from the Cellar Episode 22 -- Merchant of Venus

                 
   ...

Read more...

You know... This one doesn't outstay it's welcome.

But in all seriousness, love Merchant of Venus. I'm ready to play again to erase the shame that was my score last game.

I have a variety of mixed feelings on MoV. I like it as the progenitor of PU&D games. There's room to argue that no one has done it better in all of the derivations that have come since. But when I think about elegance in design, especially for something that spawned a host of imitators, I don't really think of MoV in the same way that I don't think especially highly of Dominion when I think about deckbuilding. Yes, it does just what it says on the tin, but PU&D games for me have always been more about story than function. I like Black Fleet. I like Tiny Epic Pirates. But I like Merchants & Marauders more than either of them because the latter tells more of a story.

When FFG/Stronghold released their version, the caterwauling around here about the different ruleset was absurd. Yes, FFG put their own touch on the game... but they also included the original rules so everyone could play the original! People treated it like sacrilege that FFG would provide an alternate version of what was then considered a grail game (and kind of is again, since it's been out of print for so long.) But, y'know, there were some things I liked about the FFG ruleset better than the original (Heresy!), because the opportunities for story were greater with the chrome that they'd added. That said, the symmetry of the original rules is just as enjoyable as it ever was. But I was kind of put off by some of the reaction around here and, needing real money at one point. I sold off some things that could actually generate money and that was one of them. I kinda regret it now, but given that I have M&M and TEP and an almost-complete set of Firefly... Eh.

That said, I'm interested to hear what all of your reactions were, especially if any of you were first-timers,

I think it’s worth a listen and I’ll admit to only having played the original rules. That said, our goal during out long weekend at the shore (starting today) is to give the “standard” rules a shot.

Given Mr. Hamblen’s age and stature in the industry it felt disrespectful to do a rewrite without at least consulting him on it. I think that shied me away from it as much as anything else.

Yeah, that's fair. I wonder how much of that was his choice and how much was their choice, given the licensing dispute (he sold it to Stronghold, previous publisher sold it to FFG.) I wonder if he didn't feel right working with FFG after having made his choice for Stronghold. Given their close cooperation with the creators of CE and Dune (for Rex), it would be odd if they didn't try to contact him at all. If they did and he just said "No, thanks", then you can't really fault them for going ahead with their planned revision.